Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

An article in the British Journal of General Practice published online, on the 29th April 2021, sets out a mixture of support, disdain and implied ineffectiveness of the role that lifestyle medicine[1] has in the restoration and generation of human health. The direct journal response online allows only for 350 words. A fuller response is found below.

Analysis of the burden and economic impact of digestive diseases and investigation of research gaps and priorities in the field of digestive health in the European Region—White Book 2: Executive summary

A Blueprint for Organizational Strategies To Promote the Well-being of Health Care Professionals

JCM, Free Full-Text

The Worldwide Prevalence of Sleep Problems Among Medical Students by Problem, Country, and COVID-19 Status: a Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of 109 Studies Involving 59427 Participants

Complications of Asthma: Medical and Lifestyle

Doctors Urge More 'Lifestyle Medicine,' Fewer Pharmaceuticals, by Robert Roy Britt

Multi-omics microsampling for the profiling of lifestyle-associated changes in health

Business Plans for a Lifestyle Medicine Center

PDF) Exemplary medical care or Trojan horse? An analysis of the 'lifestyle medicine' movement

Publications, WELL For Life

Prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus using hematological factors based on machine learning approaches: a cohort study analysis

Lifestyle medicine analysed – Poorly