The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether The Last of Us Part I is worth the $70 asking price, the question surrounding this remake is how much the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog treat this as a total do-over, changing the level design, gameplay mechanics and player upgrades? It has become obvious over the last few weeks, as Sony released a handful of preview videos, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the game directors told Engadget that the goal was to bring massively updated visuals and a host of quality-of-life improvements to a game that would otherwise stay true to its roots.

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Good Life, Book by Robert Waldinger, Marc Schulz

The Last of Us Part II Will Dismantle Some of What Fans Hold

The Last of Us game makers explain the hype surrounding HBO series

Assassin's Creed Mirage is Out Now and the Creative Director

The Last Of Us Creator Says A Decision Has Already Been Made

Do you expect new story content if The Last of Us Part II

The Last of Us review: True to the game, and just as hard-hitting

How Will 'The Last Of Us' End? The Original Game Ending & Possible

The Last of Us Part I - Wikipedia

Is it me or the remake looks worse than the original? : r/TheLastOfUs2

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Last of Us' HBO Show vs Video Game: The Biggest Differences

The Last of Us' HBO Show vs Video Game: The Biggest Differences

The Case Against the Trauma Plot